Friday, July 20, 2007
Using the Power of the Purse
The news that Bush and Gonzales will prohibit the Justice Department from enforcing Congressional subpoenas is just another example of the lawless desperation of this White House. I'm relatively hopeful that the courts will give this position the ridicule and condemnation it so richly deserves, but in the mean time, I'm all for Mark Kleiman's idea: Congress should start cutting appropriations for the executive branch.
Defund the non-essential (and dangerous) parts of the Executive Office of the President: the press office, the political office, the White House Counsel's office. None of those has any Constitutional standing; they exist only insofar as Congress appropriates money for them.
Cut the immediate office of the Attorney General back to one secretary. Forbid details.
Bush keeps repeating that the only power that Congress has to curb his excesses is the power of the purse. He's wrong about that, to be sure, but that doesn't mean that Congress shouldn't use that power in this case.
Comments
Add a Comment
Blah blah blah...
Comments are limited to 2000 characters. HTML allowed: <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and <a href="http://www.folley.net/">links</a>.
"…If the Democrats handle it correctly — which means, above all, stressing the insult to the rule of law and the threat to the Constitutional order — they'll have the public on their side, along with the bulk of elite opinion…"
Didn't Congress vote a pay increase recently? Yes.
Repubocrate / Demolican …whatever. My guess is if the Amazing Kriskin were to make a prediction, we will find public opinion sliding against Congress. If taken a poll, unless related participants somehow benefit by law or code slanted towards a gain, the bulk of elite opinion will be against Congress. We can see how much the new Congress has accomplished. What goal was reached within the first 100 hrs of the "new" Congress? I missed the results.
Picture this image Nancy Pelosi, standing up on the Titanics bow yelling IM KING OF THE WORLD (or at least Congress) just as DiCaprios did the 97 version of Titanic ouch!